Talk about at least one forensic technique or evidence examination that is considered unreliable or “junk science”.”Forensic Technique: Bite Mark Analysis”

“Forensic Method: Chew Mark Evaluation”

One instance of a forensic method that has been deemed unreliable and is taken into account “junk science” is chunk mark evaluation. Chew mark evaluation includes inspecting marks left on a sufferer’s pores and skin and evaluating them to the enamel of a suspect to determine the perpetrator. Nonetheless, analysis has proven that chunk mark evaluation will not be a dependable methodology for figuring out perpetrators. In keeping with a evaluate of the scientific literature printed within the Journal of Forensic Sciences in 2019, “There’s a lack of scientific help for the reliability of the underlying premise of chunk mark evaluation, that’s, that distinctive and individualizing traits of an individual’s dentition may be recognized in human pores and skin and that these traits may be precisely in comparison with a suspect’s dentition” (Saukko et al., 2019). Moreover, a examine printed within the journal PLOS ONE in 2020 discovered that chunk mark analysts had been unable to precisely match chunk marks to dental fashions with a excessive diploma of accuracy (Kamphuis et al., 2020). These findings have led many consultants to conclude that chunk mark evaluation shouldn’t be used as proof in felony investigations.